Just musing, no pun intended - does this really need a category of its own, or can't we just lump it under 'Abstractions' and 'Royalty'?
Corgi 06:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I don't see a need for a Title category. --mnenyver 13:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I think it's worth it's own page, if only because I suspect the exact identity of the Storm King is going to be Very important to future plot lines. (kdorian)--72.148.40.181 04:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, there's no question about it being a page - the previous discussion was about it being the sole inhabitor of a category. I did some more category pruning recently, too, trying to make a more shapely tree of it (wikia bonsai?) -- Corgi 08:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
No more GG_news ?[]
The "confirmed" link about the storm king being confirmed doesn't work. The macro is GG_news. Does anyone know what that is supposed to do?
The link isn't a comic link, but the next day (20090302) mentions the storm king. Argadi (talk) 21:21, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
Added a link to an archived version of the actual news Agge.se (talk) 15:58, May 9, 2016 (UTC)