Is the list of inhabitants redundant now that we have Category:Characters from Castle Wulfenbach? If there's no objection, we might want to replace it with a link. -Acacia, as 17:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, probably. :) Also, do we really need pages for Dormitory and Nursery? Seems like info about areas on the Castle should just go in this article. --mnenyver 19:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I'd be inclined to leave the character list. The Category can't include the one-line summaries that the list can, and in some cases, does. That has value (and Wikipedia among others, recognizing that value, tends to do category-like lists in articles just as they're done here). As for the Dormitory and Nursery links, I think Dormitory in particular could be a useful stand-alone if someone will write an article that explores the interpersonal dynamics of the place -- which are an important part of the story. I'm not sure that anybody will write that article, but I recommend leaving the red link there as an invitation. Nursery, however, is probably redundant and could be dispensed with. -- that old bearded guy 19:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Question: Is THIS castle Wulfenbach? It seems about the same size, the gun turrets are in the same place. The only thing that's different is the face on the front. ~~The Accountless Avenger

Undoubtedly. Apart from being seen from a different angle, how is it different? ⚙Zarchne 03:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I agree. The front face looks substantially the same as previous images . Argadi 19:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry I didn't see the tusks before in the previous image. they were hard to spot >_< ~~The accountless avenger

When with a link to the category rather than a full list of current residents (which would need constant monitoring to keep current). I'm inclined to think that the clean-up tag can be removed at this point. --DryBrook 05:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.