Forum:2014-12-31 (Wednesday)

Forums: Index > Page-by-Page > 2014-12-31 (Wednesday)

Discussion for comic for 2014-12-31 (Wednesday) ✣ .

Forum:2014-12-29 (Monday) ← ♦ → Forum:2015-01-02 (Friday)

The wiki pages don't just write themselves, join in on the fun.

Well, fiddlesticks! Y'all try to have a happy New Year anyway. -- Billy Catringer (talk) 09:22, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

I would say that there are a minimum of seven more outfits to come. Perhaps they won't all be posted individually, but, considering how elaborate the outfits are, I expect that they will be.

The outfits (minimum list):

Additional likely outfits

Additional possible outfits

Agatha's Sparky Dressed-in-Rags Outfit ✣
Mama Gkika's Gown ✣ , although we never really get a good look at it
Agatha's Cogwheel PJs ✣
Krosp's King Outfit ✣

So, I expect the fashion clank interruption will last at least six more pages (if Gil and Tarvek's outfits are presented together), probably nine, and possibly twelve or more. -- William Ansley (talk) 19:26, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

I hate to say this, William, but that is just too much of a good thing. Not that there is anything wrong with digital paper dolls per se but they do take a long time to assemble. -- Billy Catringer (talk) 19:43, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

I am not saying this is I something I want, either; it is just what I expect. I would prefer to see the story continue. If the Foglios would take the time they are spending on paper dolls to work on building up a backlog of pages, then I would be happier with the hiatus, but they have proven time and again that they don't do such things. -- William Ansley (talk) 22:12, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

Well, you hafta admit that they are the authors of the Girl Genius stories. I suppose that we shall just have to grin and bear it. -- Billy Catringer (talk) 22:27, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

We're fans on the Internet! We heap abuse on the people who create the things we love! Haven't you read the manual? ;-) -- William Ansley (talk) 22:56, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

Of course I have! It's just that I often find what is in the manual disgusting. I wonder who wrote the damned thing? -- Billy Catringer (talk) 09:56, January 2, 2015 (UTC)