User blog comment:Bkharvey/Things I don't understand/@comment-34640406-20180122205623/@comment-32330664-20180122211604

Hmm, I'm not sure all those types are really necessary, but I would prune rather than delete the article. For example, it's useful to know whether a Jäger is considered a construct even though once human and not created surgically.

Back in the early days, before I discovered it, the Wiki really went in for listing types of things, e.g., all the different shapes of what I guess are now understood all to be Dreen. (Or am I wrong about that?)