Talk:Assistant/Mad

Growl rower bazzle
This is the wrong use of a mad page. Forums are the right place for back and forth discussions.

Secondly, I deliberately worded what I said carefully so that it IMO fit in among the things that can be said on a main page. I did not say she was a muse I said she might be. The observation that she is never without her book is canon. In all of her appearances sans knife at her throat she has her book. The fact that there is a muse with such a book is also canon. The fact that that muse also has a smokestack on her head is again canon. The inference from this that we may be looking at the personification of that muse is a reasonable inference as long as it not stated as an incontrovertible fact. Unless someone comes up with a convincing argument I will put this back on the main page after Mondays page comes out.

Hobart, you are welcome to discuss this with me here or on my talk page. I hope to do things when we are in consensus. Argadi has expressed your reluctance also. I don't wish to edit war without discussion. OTOH I feel quite strongly about my position and will not yield it unless presented with arguments that are more convincing than mine. One way or another all have to be in consensus. --Rej¿ ¤¤ ? 06:33, April 15, 2011 (UTC)