User:Mnenyver/TalkArchive

Category Tree
Yes, you did. Sounded like a good idea. Didn't mean to step on your toes. I thought maybe you were stuck. I won't be offended if you rename/rearrange. — Zarchne 17:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for organising the images - I wasn't sure how to handle that myself, or if somebody had some scheme in mind already. Corgi 21:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm still not sure I'm doing it right, but I figure it's better to have room to expand (ie. use subcats) than to have to reorganize a whole bunch of images later. --mnenyver 21:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Be you admin?
Thanks for the welcome, I'll be glad to help where I can. Are you an admin? I inadvertently created Graybeard when I meant to be creating User:Graybeard -- not sure how that happened, I've never seen that before -- and of course the former page should be deleted. -- that old bearded guy 03:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * A wikia admin? Nope, not I. At least it's redirecting to your user page? :) --Mnenyver 03:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You are a GG admin now. Zarchne 03:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words...
But I can't claim credit for "Category: Living Impaired characters." Somebody else came up with that on the Errant Story wiki, where I'm a regular and sysop (and which, btw, I suggest perusing for ideas as to how this wiki might develop). The irony is that that's one of the few categories there that I did not create... -- that old bearded guy 03:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion etiquette
I was trying to respond to your inquiry about "deletion etiquette," but the spam filter keeps tripping -- I have no idea why. I'd say don't worry about the deletion action for a couple of days, but in the mean time, any idea what's with the filter? -- that old bearded guy 05:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

E-mail
Try now. I just forgot to check the box. -- that old bearded guy 15:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I beg your pardon
I was under the impression that it was Corgi who had written the character analysis section on Klaus. I stand corrected. You did a very good job, by the way. Feel free to help me with Agatha! (Were you going to be tackling Gil, or was that someone else?)

Thanks! re my work on Agatha's page. I've got a ways to go, but at least I think I'm going in the right direction. Acacia's work on Gil looks pretty good, too. -Evaneyreddeman 21:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Unstoppable? Try Bored
Or maybe addicted. I had a slow day at work today...and I just couldn't stop. The list of redlinks was bugging me. I'm really, really, tired now. I guess I was trying to take a break from thinking about the article on Agatha. It's bugging me, too. -Evaneyreddeman 02:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that you lost your work on Agatha. I was looking forward to seeing it, especially for help on the History section. But it's good to know that I'm not the only one who's addicted... -Evaneyreddeman 17:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I tidied up my History section, and I've posted the new version of the article. What do you think? -Evaneyreddeman 19:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Wild Jägers
Sheesh, everybody's got it in for them! :) I created the category on purpose, honest, because I thought it was a good subdivision, and it's been nibbled by ducks since. :)

Corgi 00:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Bold text

Out of curiosity ...
... What flavor of wannabe scientist? I'm a nuclear chemist and wannabe retiree (and musician). -- that old bearded guy 21:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)